Dear faithful followers, please take notice (OCDINFORMATION getting awake again)


Hello everyone –

new additions to this site have been very scarce. The main reasons for this virtual hibernation are OCD-related, but also a late diagnosis of ASD (autism spectrum disorder) played a huge part. I hope to write some chapters dedicated to these matters – because I think we can learn from such issues, and thereby turn not-so-positive experiences into helpful stuff.

I played around with starting a new blog, and integrate my older postings into the new one, which should be more structured. But this project didn’t have a real lift-off, for the above – yet.

Now that my circumstances got more stable, I just said to myself: please, Frank, don’t ruminate on how it should turn out, that new blog, don’t get stuck in the planning phase (hallmarks of OCD).

So I just started.

So I have the pleasure of inviting you to the new beast. It’s scope is wider: since OCD has a few pretty close brethren, it will also be about ASD, and SUD (substance use disorder, or addiction). In addition, I will write about clinical depression (major depressive disorder, MDD), and schizophrenia (SCZ).

Yes, it’s much, very much. It’s about disorders that are devastating and incapacitating, I can’t emphasize that enough. I hope to raise awareness about these diseases a bit.

But it is also rewarding. Insight means knowledge. It also offers mental handles to properly and decently deal with patients. The knowledge will eventually become part of one’s intuition. I went through this process myself, and it’s a great route to go.

Together we can gradually eliminate misconceptions, misunderstandings, ignorance, things that can have damaging consequences for sufferers of the above afflictions.

Now I have the honour to re-direct you, readers, to the Son Of This Site, namely: That Site:

http://www.antidisestablishmentarianismology.wordpress.com

(Please don’t laugh…)

It’s in its infancy, of course.

Finally, I want to thank all of you for tuning in again and again. And sending nice compliments… only yesterday I found a sidebar with your messages, and I must admit that I shed a couple of tears, because my first effort meant something to people out there.

Thank you. Very much so.

Best to all, Frank.

An Article On Hoarding in ‘The New Yorker’


Hi folks –

in my book the New Yorker is the finest magazine on Earth.

They published an article on hoarding; the seemingly endless collecting of things that the patient won’t, or is unable to, do away with. ‘Things’ is a broad concept here. It can comprise objects its owner holds dear, the way any collector loves his stuff: books, paintings, furniture, watches, cameras, ah well, why not include butterflies, pressure cookers, or coffee beans?

In hoarding, however, it’s gone out of hand, in two senses: the objects clutter precious living space, they’ve become obstacles, they can lead to accidents, to social isolation, up to making any kind of normal life impossible.

The second sense: hoarding often isn’t limited to meaningful objects alone, or even is all about being unable to discard things that others would have gotten rid of long ago in no time. The typical hoarder is vexed by doubt: can I throw this or that away, or is it of any value still? What should I do?

The rather problematic outcome is that the hoarder ends up with keeping everything. To end the doubt, and to end the worries about possibly getting rid of worthwhile stuff.

And the picture isn’t complete yet. Many hoarders are sentenced to live in ever more squalid surroudings; food residues, with vermin in and around them, are not an exception. Because getting evicted from their living quarters frequently is the result of their mental inability, they may end up homeless.

It’s nothing to laugh about, and in my opinion, sensational real-life TV garbage (how fitting a term!) about the disorder (that is what it is) are completely inappropriate, untoward. One should never derive feelings of pleasure from, or let oneself be entertained by the misfortune of others.

That stinks, folks.

Until a couple of years ago, hoarding firmly belonged to the core dimensions of OCD: contamination/washing, checking, order and symmetry, and religious/sexual preoccupations (with intrusive, unstoppable trains of thought).

But nowadays it’s seen as a disorder of its own, related to OCD (included in its spectrum). This on the grounds of several distinctive characteristics, e.g. the way hoarders respond to therapy and medication, possibly also genetic differences.

I myself had rather seen it stay within the ‘traditional’ group of ‘authentic OCD forms’, so to speak. There are phenomenogical reasons (obsessional and compulsive traits, avoidance behaviour); and also evolutionary correspondences that exist between hoarding and the other OCD dimensions. This is more than sufficient to keep it in its original class, I think that there are other and very convincing criteria apart from the way hoarders respond to treatment.

OK, enough for now, and here is the link to the New Yorker article. I would appreciate it very much if you, readers, would post your opinions about it, and also, should you feel like it, give a comment on my personal opinion about the place of hoarding in the scheme of things.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/12/15/let-go

OCD and addiction disorders


Dear readers –

this is meant as a brief preview:

there seem to be intriguing similarities between OCD and substance use disorders (SUDs). One of the key terms here is: inhibition, or perhaps better: deficits in inhibition.

I won’t go into the question whether ‘free will’ plays a role here, that is for later. Folks having OCD, and these include yours truly, know that OCD never was ‘wanted’ in the first place; it is something that comes over you and that you can’t do anything about; eventually it may hijack that what others see as their personal freedoms, life choices, and it may severely incapacitate and impair one’s quality 0f life in all aspects.

Substance addiction is increasingly believed to limit the volitional capacities of an addict along similar lines, and seen in this light, expressions like ‘weak willpower’ or ‘lacking character’ are insults, and not to be used to coerce addicts into abstinence, or more sober life.

People with OCD, as well as those with SUDs, are, metaphorically speaking, ‘sentenced’ to do what they do. Their choices are limited. There are people who lose their partner, their job, perhaps more, through OCD, and the same applies to people who are addicted.

I think that both groups have, by some imbalance in their brain, to choose the short-term type of decreasing intense fears over other considerations. One may have important job application appointment, and still be under the shower for two hours after the appointment already was canceled by the potential employer (my example).  An addict may visualize his life partner leaving her/him, say, in two months time if she/he doesn’t stay sober, and still the drug has to be taken to find a form of inner peace.

These behaviours defy anything that is understood as: common sense, grip on reality, or, more precisely put: rational behaviour.

The rituals, be they intrusive thoughts and accompanying rituals (including habits in a motor system sense of the word) have to be performed first, no matter what, and even if the patient realizes in full what she/he is putting at stake. Fear and anxiety overrule reason, at great cost.

Now, I hear some people thinking: but hey, in how far are people with SUDs to be blamed for their behaviour? They started taking their substances themselves in a situation where their will was unimpaired, no?

That in itself might be true, but in a much more limited way than we thought,  is the modern take on these things.  People may have a disposition towards ingesting substances in ever increasing quantities; of a genetic and environmental nature, and as a means to suppress social anxiety, for instance.

There are many questions in this field, that may get partially resolved in the near future. I will return shortly with more detailed information on this topic.

Welcome again, thanks for visiting, and future plans


Hello all –

a fine day for everyone (it’s near 8 AM here in Holland).

In the near future I will include topics like: the things OCD and substance use disorders (SUDs) have in common, and links between OCD and autism spectrum disorders. Interesting new material on these matters has, um, materialized.

Meanwhile, progress has been made in treatment for refractory OCD (which is a difficult beast,  hardly responsive to cognitive behavioural therapy and current types of medication). Deep brain stimulation (DSB)  looks like an effective means for decreasing symptoms. Also, there is rTMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation (non-invasive), which seems to be a promising technique for combating OCD symptoms.

Best to all, hope to see you soon,

Frank.

It’s Nov 16, 2014, Folks


…apparently something went wrong with the date of my previous post.

It is Nov 16, 2014, now, and I just wrote that I will continue the present blog.

Best to all, Frank.

Blog Continued From Now On


Hi all –

due to several reasons (some OCD-related) I have been absent for quite some time.

In the interim I have decided to just continue this blog, albeit in a more structured way.

I hope to see lots of those who already visited again, and also to attract new readers.

All the best to all of you out there,

Frank.

Aside

Hi all –

finally, I am in the position to make a re-start with the blog. I want to thank you for being patient, many of you looked here from time to time to see whether there is anything new.

So we’re heading for the 30,000 mark in terms of visits/visitors – that’s a wonderful thing.

I decided to do the following: to start again, in a more focused manner, and not to wade through all previous posts and re-writing and ordering these. That is a very time-consuming thing to do, and I do not have that time. See the past stuff as some point of entry. All of this means that I will, in all probability, write things that already were brought under your collective attention. But all in all I think that it will be the most fruitful way to continue.

Furthermore, I will reply to comments that have been sent in the meantime. Thanks to those who did that.

That’s it for now, folks. Have a great day, Frank.